Author Topic: Masternodes Testing (Round 1)  (Read 115617 times)

devlin

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #90 on: January 27, 2015, 09:19:14 pm »
Received 120 tSPR. Thanks.

Paullavr

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #91 on: January 27, 2015, 09:21:00 pm »
Hello! Can I get 200 testSPR to mxqkbx1gEaQ1RUgQH7bcxqiVj2rk8abLuU

georgem

  • Tech Admin
  • ******
  • Posts: 924
    • View Profile
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #92 on: January 27, 2015, 09:23:13 pm »
ok, votes start coming in... for the MN i just deactived... lol

xojex

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #93 on: January 27, 2015, 09:23:35 pm »
please send some coins to this test address: mkzS9kzakbXmHb68DGHfwfdGXvwpUrors7

SJRulez83

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 64
  • IT Manager,Software Developer and Geek
    • View Profile
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #94 on: January 27, 2015, 09:23:40 pm »
Likewise any donations would be appreciated.....

myFanwSSgCoQw7WCrQkxDbYniPJnDeAwKX
mxXaktbpUDoBrSYUyEXDXgGexQaQJzycdo

Strumpet!

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
    • View Profile
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #95 on: January 27, 2015, 09:24:48 pm »
Note that we need 300 elected masternodes.

I can VM clone about 7 nodes within probably an hour

I've also transferred a rig to mining test spr so expect a jump in hash rate of about 1-2MH/s
As I already said it will not work, algorithm was changed to prevent this, you will need to patch the miner

I don't suppose this could be made permanent, I have some FX8's on the way...  :-*

Paullavr

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #96 on: January 27, 2015, 09:25:45 pm »
Received 200 tSPR. Thanks ;)

Mr. Spread

  • Core Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 105
    • View Profile
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #97 on: January 27, 2015, 09:28:00 pm »
ok, votes start coming in... for the MN i just deactived... lol
There is some lag, nodes see that it was running for some time and vote for it

georgem

  • Tech Admin
  • ******
  • Posts: 924
    • View Profile
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #98 on: January 27, 2015, 09:32:55 pm »
So voting can reach values between 0% and 100%.

100% means that all other MNs have found your MN to be "good"?

SJRulez83

  • Admin
  • *****
  • Posts: 64
  • IT Manager,Software Developer and Geek
    • View Profile
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #99 on: January 27, 2015, 09:34:20 pm »
Note that we need 300 elected masternodes.

I can VM clone about 7 nodes within probably an hour

I've also transferred a rig to mining test spr so expect a jump in hash rate of about 1-2MH/s
As I already said it will not work, algorithm was changed to prevent this, you will need to patch the miner

I don't suppose this could be made permanent, I have some FX8's on the way...  :-*

Im glad i switched back to live miing, hit a block within 3 minutes. I see to have more luck in the first few minutes than running for days on end.

minerpage

  • Admin / Donator
  • ******
  • Posts: 113
    • View Profile
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #100 on: January 27, 2015, 09:35:35 pm »
What's in the "Score" value?

Mr. Spread

  • Core Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 105
    • View Profile
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #101 on: January 27, 2015, 09:39:17 pm »
So voting can reach values between 0% and 100%.

100% means that all other MNs have found your MN to be "good"?
For non elected masternodes votes shown are to elect them, for elected masternodes votes are to de elect them. Once votes reach 50% masternode will be elected or deelected.
As you see non elected masternodes with more amounts have generally more votes, that's because they have a priority.
There are also to many votes to deelect elected masternodes, this is strange.

mrcashking

  • Marketing
  • ****
  • Posts: 59
  • @MRCASHKING On Twitter
    • View Profile
    • Twitter
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #102 on: January 27, 2015, 09:40:13 pm »
need some test spr please. mv3XC7M5uWm9pDtWLko23DF8qRYrR7vp1i
SPREAD: SPqyhkh3zdNGwKSZDq8ZNzyHasxWSM8UCE

georgem

  • Tech Admin
  • ******
  • Posts: 924
    • View Profile
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #103 on: January 27, 2015, 09:42:06 pm »
So voting can reach values between 0% and 100%.

100% means that all other MNs have found your MN to be "good"?
For non elected masternodes votes shown are to elect them, for elected masternodes votes are to de elect them. Once votes reach 50% masternode will be elected or deelected.
As you see non elected masternodes with more amounts have generally more votes, that's because they have a priority.
There are also to many votes to deelect elected masternodes, this is strange.

Oh, I see, and here I was thinking the we already have 79 MNs running, when in reality the number of active and elected MN is much lower.
Only the elected ones count.

Aha, therefor for an elected masternode the best vote is to have 0%, right?

Mr. Spread

  • Core Developer
  • ******
  • Posts: 105
    • View Profile
Re: Masternodes Testing
« Reply #104 on: January 27, 2015, 09:43:27 pm »
What's in the "Score" value?
This is node response time. Once we will have fully working instant transactions this value will show how fast your node is confirming transactions. Right now masternodes simply confirm certain blocks. Masternodes running for a long time should have score close to zero.