Hahah.  Well, I didn't want ALL of it 

If you need some back to setup more, I'm happy to send it your way.

At this point my main computer has well over 130 masternodes and it could care less.  Everyone should be running a boatload of these things.

As Mr. Spread adds more functionality in the future that won't work, but for now it sure does.

What would help is for the ones running MN over 200 to break them up into smaller ones. Especially the ones running in the thousands in a MN.

Quote from: antonio8 on February 09, 2015, 04:02:39 am

What would help is for the ones running MN over 200 to break them up into smaller ones. Especially the ones running in the thousands in a MN.

I've been having a (little bit of a) hard time with the big amounts received being automatically used for a MN... I define smaller ones but the big number still stays (even when I don;t activate the MN, it's still in there)... I guess it takes a while for it to be voted out...

You can go in the coin control section of the wallet and seperate it there.



You can see here how I have my 1,000 coin MN checked to assign it into different values. It used to be at 2,000

I had to do that when I had a large amount sent to me.

While I agree the more testers the merrier, sometimes it's a small group of people that have to step up and be the early adopters and make shit happen

In time, I'm sure we'll have lots of testers.  But right now, there's not that many of us.

Quote from: minerpage on February 09, 2015, 04:20:53 am

Quote from: antonio8 on February 09, 2015, 04:02:39 am

What would help is for the ones running MN over 200 to break them up into smaller ones. Especially the ones running in the thousands in a MN.

I've been having a (little bit of a) hard time with the big amounts received being automatically used for a MN... I define smaller ones but the big number still stays (even when I don;t activate the MN, it's still in there)... I guess it takes a while for it to be voted out...

You can go in the coin control section of the wallet and seperate it there.



You can see here how I have my 1,000 coin MN checked to assign it into different values. It used to be at 2,000

I had to do that when I had a large amount sent to me.

Ah... ok... that worked...

I have 187 masternodes on one computer and 50 on another.

So yeah, start adding to your masternode count, folks

If we receive tSPR from the faucet, do we still need to send them to ourself again?

I just fucked up all my masternodes... more than a 100 of them
Single transaction.

Details:
The wallet they were running on held the "escrow".
5 addresses (adr1 - 5)
But the same wallet was on another PC, both PCes mining.
Not on a single address though. I was creating MNs on PC1 only.
On PC2 I transfered everything available to adr1 and then all MNs were sacked.

I guess this is not a normal behavior, but it's good to know...


EDIT: btw, the miningprivkey=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx doesn't work in spreadcoin.conf.
Not on my PCes anyway... I might be missing something...

Well the election process seems to be taking longer than last time. Due to more MNs or something Mr Spread changed I don't know, but if it's like this on mainnet it's going to make picking your MN collateral 'price' interesting - get it too low and you could have wasted a day or two... 

We have 800 MN's in less than 24 hours.  It took longer than 24 hours for 300 MN's to be established last time...if I am not mistaken...

Not sure how this applies to mainnet but I think we do have our stress test. 

I hate to say it because I appreciate elbandi's work but the faucet might have actually slowed down the test process.  We have definite stress interest and what seems to be a slow and steady stream of tSPR (or is that relevant?)