I voted 2c as in, yeah I'm fairly certain we'll at least hit that at some point given my positive outlook on successful servicenode implementation and liquidity drying up as staunch supporters like myself continuously buy fairly large amounts fairly cheaply.

The problem is without continuous updates, transparency, or at least a somewhat tentative road map from the development team, investor confidence will begin to waver.  We're not the only coin looking at masternodes anymore.  In fact, it's looking like bitcredits and crave may have them out far sooner than our next round of testnet.  However, I think if we can roll out servicenodes with instant transactions in the next few months, the sky is the limit and would give the development team a tremendous amount breathing room and time to look at other implementations for service nodes as the dynamic masternodes and ease of set up would be more than enough incentive to bring in a slew of new investors.  Especially considering how inexpensive it'll likely be to run a service node, at least initially, compared to the alternatives.

I say we should put them out then work on bugs.